"Inspect every piece of pseudoscience and you will find a security blanket, a thumb to suck, a skirt to hold. What does the scientist have to offer in exchange? Uncertainty! Insecurity!"
— Isaac Asimov
Here we go again:
Intelligent design (ID) is not science because it lacks empirical evidence, testability, and falsifiability—key criteria that define scientific theories. While ID proponents present it as a scientific alternative to evolution, it fundamentally mirrors biblical creationism, positing that life's complexity is the result of an unspecified intelligent cause, rather than natural processes.
The core of ID relies on theological claims about a designer, but it avoids explicitly identifying the designer, often to bypass constitutional restrictions on promoting religion in public schools. This tactic aims to introduce religious concepts into science curricula under the guise of science, attempting to circumvent the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which mandates a separation of church and state in public education.
Though a longtime reader of The TalkOrigins Archive, I first read about ID at length in Robert Pennock's 2000 book Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism. His book was also where I first learned about The Wedge Strategy, which was drafted by the Discovery Institute in 1998. It's goal is to change American culture by shaping public policy to reflect politically conservative fundamentalist evangelical Protestant values.
Hmmm ... where have I seen this before?
The Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 is a comprehensive initiative aimed at reshaping U.S. federal policies and governance and emphasizes the promotion of traditional values, including religious principles, within public life. This focus aligns with their broader mission to influence policy through a conservative lens, often intertwining cultural and religious considerations.
Charlatans!